All your benchmarks

Choosing the right AI development platform isn’t just about features—it’s about how well it adapts to your workflow, scales with your goals, and stays out of your way while you build. Flowise and Dify both offer powerful no-code tools to create intelligent agents and RAG systems, but their philosophies diverge in subtle, important ways. Flowise leans into flexibility and developer control, with deep LangChain roots and a clean, modular interface. Dify, meanwhile, is built for speed and enterprise readiness—offering tighter integrations, stronger observability, and a more opinionated path from idea to production. This benchmark isn’t about declaring a winner. It’s about helping you see where each platform shines: whether you need granular customization, seamless enterprise deployment, or something in between. Look closely at how they handle agents, RAG pipelines, and observability—these are the real differentiators when your AI moves from prototype to production.

Feature Flowise Dify
Category AI Development Platform AI Development Platform
License Apache License 2.0 Dify Open Source License (Apache 2.0 with additional conditions)
Open Source Yes Yes
GitHub Stars 42,000 70,000+
Primary Technology LangChain Custom (LangChain-inspired, with RAG + Agent Capabilities)
Visual Builder Drag-and-drop UI for Assistants, Chatflows, Agentflows Visual Canvas (No-Code/Low-Code) with Workflow Builder
Agent Capabilities Multi-agent systems, Tool Calling, Human-in-the-loop, Execution Traces Function Calling, ReAct, Tool Usage, Multi-step Reasoning
RAG Support Yes, with data transforms and indexing pipelines Yes, built-in RAG pipeline with chunking, embedding, and vector search
Supported Vector Databases Pinecone, Vectara, Qdrant, Chroma, FAISS, Weaviate Milvus, Weaviate, Qdrant, Chroma, PostgreSQL (pgvector), Alibaba Cloud ApsaraDB
Supported LLMs 100+ including OpenAI, Anthropic, proprietary models OpenAI, GPT, Mistral, Llama3, Claude, Ollama, Alibaba Tongyi, Bedrock, OpenAI API-compatible
Built-in Tools & Plugins 100+ data sources, custom Python/JS code, MCP nodes 50+ (Google Search, DALL·E, WolframAlpha, Bright Data, Mem0), Plugin Marketplace
Template Marketplace Yes Yes, community workflows
API Access Yes (REST, /api/v1/prediction/:id) Yes, all features exposed via RESTful APIs
SDKs TypeScript, Python dify-ai-provider (TypeScript/Node.js), REST API
CLI Support Yes No (Deployment via Docker/K8s)
Embedded Chat Widget Yes Yes (via API)
Observability Prometheus, OpenTelemetry, Execution logs, visual debugging Native Langfuse integration (tracing, metrics, prompt management)
LLMOps Features Evaluations, Datasets, Metrics Log monitoring, prompt performance analysis, dataset annotation, model comparison, feedback loops
Backend-as-a-Service No (APIs for workflows only) Yes, all apps expose APIs for external integration
Deployment Options Cloud, On-premises, Docker, Render, Node.js Cloud, Docker Compose, Kubernetes (Helm), AWS Marketplace, Alibaba Cloud, Azure AKS, Terraform, CDK
Self-Hosting Yes Yes
Enterprise Features SLA, Dedicated Support, RBAC, SSO, Encrypted credentials, Secret Managers (AWS, Vault, Azure), Rate Limiting, Restricted Domains SAML/SSO, Advanced RBAC, Audit Logs, Private Cloud, Custom Branding, SLA, Dedicated Support
Security & Compliance GDPR, CCPA compliant (self-hosted), No public security audits Enterprise-grade security, on-premise deployment, compliance-ready
Pricing Model Free tier, Paid scaling by users/teams Free tier (Cloud, 200 GPT-4 calls), Self-hosted (open-source), Premium (AWS), Enterprise (custom)
Scalability Horizontal scaling with queues/workers, Vertical scaling Scalable for traffic growth and evolving needs
Collaboration User roles (Admin, Developer, Viewer) Workspace sharing, team members, collaborative development, versioned workflows
Supported File Types PDF, TXT, CSV, XLSX, DOCX, MD, JSON, HTML PDF, PPT, DOC, TXT, CSV, JSON, MD, HTML
Language Support English, Spanish, Chinese English, Mandarin
Community Support Discord, GitHub Discussions, Active open-source community GitHub Discussions, GitHub Issues, Discord, X (Twitter)
Support Channels Discord, GitHub, support@flowiseai.com Email, Discord, security@dify.ai
Documentation https://docs.flowiseai.com Available (via website)
No-Code / Low-Code Yes (No-code and Low-code) Yes (No-code/Low-code)
Target Users Beginners, Developers, Non-technical users, Enterprise Developers, Data Scientists, Enterprise Teams, Startups, Citizen Developers, Non-Technical Users
Notable Use Cases Career coaching, HR/finance agents, Notion automation, Telegram bots Enterprise Q&A, AI Podcasts, Document Assistants, Marketing Engines, Customer Support Automation
Performance Claims Not specified 90% ↓ operational overhead, 80% ↓ infrastructure cost, 18,000 annual hours saved
Enterprise Success Stories Workday, 10kdesigners Volvo Cars, Ricoh, Enterprise Q&A Bot (19k+ employees)
Acquisition Status Acquired by Workday (Aug 2025) Independent (LangGenius, Inc.)
Mobile Support Responsive UI (no native app) Responsive UI (no native app)
Admin Console Yes Yes (via UI)
Integration Protocol MCP Integration (client/server nodes, SSE) MCP (Model Control Protocol) Server, HTTP-based MCP (2025-03-26), NL2SQL

Choose Flowise if you’re a developer or builder who wants maximum flexibility with LangChain, deep customizability, and a no-code canvas that feels like tinkering with legos — ideal for prototyping AI agents, automating workflows, or embedding chatbots fast. Its open Apache license and simplicity make it perfect for teams that value freedom over polish.

Choose Dify if you’re building for scale — whether enterprise-grade Q&A systems, customer support automation, or production AI apps that need robust observability, built-in RAG pipelines, and seamless integration with cloud infrastructure. Its tighter enterprise tooling, native Langfuse integration, and proven deployments at companies like Volvo mean less risk and more confidence when it matters.

The difference isn’t just features — it’s philosophy. Flowise lets you build however you want. Dify helps you build right, at scale. Pick the one that matches your end goal: experimentation or execution.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Efektif

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading